1 comment Most Recent Last

Page 1 of 1 comment: Latest First
Comment No. * from:

Main email after short introduction

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: COFRA Safest and Hunter queries
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2018 11:36:51 +0100
From: roger
To: g.logoluso@cofra.it

Thank you for your reply.

1. I had already seen the images you refer to which is why I contacted you initially. "The APT sole as advertised doesn't exist, but there is a black under-sole."

Here is an images of what I found. I had to look as it was uncomfortable, notice the folded insert.

Another queries relate to my original email about the date of manufacture, which may also be why there is no APT sole??

2. On wearing for 30 minutes the boots are aggravating as they bend abruptly. Is this due to the plastic being old and more rigid due to being made in 2012, or is it a bad design??
crease on top of foot

3. On a different matter I have just bough some non-safety COFRA Hunter boots, I was expecting the New Hunter. Can you tell me what the difference is between the Hunter and New Hunter. I would also like to suggest you add the metatarsal support and the APT to the Hunter non-safety as this will improve the comfort and add sole protection. It is one thing to be lifting heavy weights and having top protection but it is more common to step on items that will penetrate the sole.

Thank you

Roger Lovejoy

29/07/18 @ 11:30