A response to Toby's Opinion

I do not subscribe to the idea of universal or blessed rights, whether applied to humans or other creatures.

I acknowledge that each form has properties and powers that are evident and more that are not. These powers confer limited might but no right.

There exist privileges, where multiple organs work to share in the booty of their joint enterprise. Such privileges that may be acquired are often termed 'a right' within the confines of the body corporate but I am assured of my own experience that none of these so called benefits are a right and can be withheld at any junction.

You have
To keep this short, I do not acquire rights by your say-so, nor do I want any privileges you think you can confer.

opinion
Opinions accredited to me are not exclusively mine, although by my use are attached to me. Yet to challenge my opinions is to query your own for why else would you debate?

to live with
People do not live but rather kill to survive, that they live 'with' implies some conjoined being which is ergo complicit in the killing spree for it's own survival.

unnecessary conflict
Unnecessary: well the sea doesn't have to bash the rocks nor the rocks stand their ground, but such is the nature, great or otherwise, of each that there is conflict; well so you would view it. Yet the yin and yang of it can be seen as a complimentary union born of the limited powers each holds to it's being.

It seems all to evident that in the spree of destruction there are those that change all the more rapidly and succumb ever more readily to being a limited resource.

Immortality of being needs no right nor resource. The only conflict is in the mind of those who would see as theirs, a resource.