Vegan Organic Wholefood
Categories: Sentiment, ProspectorsSend feedback » • PermalinkA response to Toby's Opinion
I do not subscribe to the idea of universal or blessed rights, whether applied to humans or other creatures.
I acknowledge that each form has properties and powers that are evident and more that are not. These powers confer limited might but no right.
There exist privileges, where multiple organs work to share in the booty of their joint enterprise. Such privileges that may be acquired are often termed 'a right' within the confines of the body corporate but I am assured of my own experience that none of these so called benefits are a right and can be withheld at any junction.
You have
To keep this short, I do not acquire rights by your say-so, nor do I want any privileges you think you can confer.opinion
Opinions accredited to me are not exclusively mine, although by my use are attached to me. Yet to challenge my opinions is to query your own for why else would you debate?to live with
People do not live but rather kill to survive, that they live 'with' implies some conjoined being which is ergo complicit in the killing spree for it's own survival.unnecessary conflict
Unnecessary: well the sea doesn't have to bash the rocks nor the rocks stand their ground, but such is the nature, great or otherwise, of each that there is conflict; well so you would view it. Yet the yin and yang of it can be seen as a complimentary union born of the limited powers each holds to it's being.It seems all to evident that in the spree of destruction there are those that change all the more rapidly and succumb ever more readily to being a limited resource.
Immortality of being needs no right nor resource. The only conflict is in the mind of those who would see as theirs, a resource.
Categories: Manufacturers, Product InfoSend feedback » • PermalinkBiona is a brand name used by Windmill Organics
I have just called Biona (0208 547 2775) as I noticed the ingredients list on their product ''Arrabbiatta Pasta Sauce'' claims to have 9.1 grammes of protein, which is unlikely, more likely to be 0.91g.
On checking their website I noticed that the two other jars of similar sauces also list high levels of protein.
On the website the pasta sauce with basil was listed as containing milk and nuts but was declared ''diary free''. Further the ''Arrabbiatta Pasta Sauce'' also is listed as having ''Red Pepper Cream''
From the conversation I can conform that all the tomato sauces are ''Vegan''. None of the ingredients are of animal origin. The website is being update to reflect this, hopefully.
I should be receiving an email on the nutritional breakdown, and will post it here once arrived.Update 13th march 2014
Never received an email from team but website has been updated. It still uses the word 'cream' on the ''Arrabbiatta Pasta Sauce'' . Spoke to confirm the cream only means 'blended peppers'. I went through a rather intense discussion to point out that creaming is not an ingredient and it would be best left of such a list.
Biona: Tomato Products and Sauces
Tel: 0208 547 2775
Categories: ManufacturersSend feedback » • PermalinkOur Values
- We never have, nor will test our products on animals, nor use animal ingredients, nor buy ingredients tested on animals (with a cut off date in accordance with BUAV requirements of 1988, with the exception of our Household Cleaning range which has a cut off date of 2003).
- We will not use genetically modified ingredients
- We will progressively seek to use Fair Trade ingredients when buying from Third World sources.
- All products are vegetarian, and almost all are vegan
Some problem >>> Re Green and Red text: Will call: 0161 724 4016
Have sent email to: info@faithinnature.co.uk
Categories: Manufacturers1 feedback » • PermalinkFood and Environmental Standards
Meeting the most stringent food and environmental standards is central to the Clearspring philosophy to deliver exceptional food to our customers.
Safe and free from
- All our foods meet vegan standards, as certified by the Vegan Society
- All organic foods are certified to EU standards
- All Clearspring foods are strictly non-GM.
- Selected foods are Kosher certified
Persons with food intolerances and special diets can also enjoy selected Clearspring products. Click here to find out the dietary status of each Clearspring product.
At Clearspring, we believe that health is too important to be comprised. That is why our standards are never lowered in order to meet a price. Many of our foods offer exceptional health benefits, which you can read about here.
Categories: SentimentSend feedback » • PermalinkFrom wikipedia
Daphnia are small, planktonic crustaceans, between 0.2 and 5 mm in length. Daphnia are members of the order Cladocera, and are one of the several small aquatic crustaceans commonly called water fleas because of their saltatory swimming style (although fleas are insects and thus only very distantly related). They live in various aquatic environments ranging from acidic swamps to freshwater lakes, ponds, streams and rivers.
The division of the body into segments is nearly invisible. The head is fused, and is generally bent down towards the body with a visible notch separating the two. In most species the rest of the body is covered by a carapace, with a ventral gap in which the five or six pairs of legs lie. The most prominent features are the compound eyes, the second antennae, and a pair of abdominal setae. In many species, the carapace is translucent or nearly so and as a result they make excellent subjects for the microscope as one can observe the beating heart.
Even under relatively low power microscopy, the feeding mechanism can be observed, with immature young moving in the brood-pouch; moreover, the eye being moved by the ciliary muscles can be seen, as well as blood corpuscles being pumped around the circulatory system by the simple heart. The heart is at the top of the back, just behind the head, and the average heart rate is approximately 180 bpm under normal conditions. Daphnia, like many animals, are prone to alcohol intoxication, and make excellent subjects for studying the effects of the depressant on the nervous system – due to the translucent exoskeleton, and the visibly altered heart rate. They are tolerant of being observed live under a cover slip and appear to suffer no harm when returned to open water. This experiment can also be done using caffeine, nicotine or adrenaline and observing an increase in heart rate.
From Practicle Biology"In the water flea Daphnia, the single, small heart is easily visible when viewed under transmitted light under a low power microscope. The heart rate (which can be up to 300 beats per minute) can be monitored and counted in different conditions – for example changing water temperature, or changing the type and concentration of chemicals added to the water. A change in Daphnia heart rate may not be a predictor of a similar change in human (or vertebrate) heart rate under the same conditions, but the procedure provides an interesting technique for investigating the effects of different chemicals on a metabolic process"
"Teachers should be careful to introduce these animals in a way that promotes a good ethical attitude towards them and not a simply instrumental one. Although they are simple organisms that may not ''suffer'' in the same way as higher animals, they still deserve respect. Animals should be returned promptly to the holding tank after being examined. This supports ethical approaches that are appropriate to field work where pond animals are returned to their habitat after observations have been made."
Categories: ManufacturersSend feedback » • PermalinkAnimal Testing Policy
As you can see from the Ecover statement below, they do not consider Daphnia to be animals, contrary to the Vegan Society (see last paragraph below) and Practical Biology (see final paragraph on linked Daphnia page below.Ecover is against animal testing.
Ecover has never performed or commissioned animal testing and considers testing on sentient animals to assess environmental and health risks as unnecessary. Our animal testing policy is as follows:
• Since our foundation in 1980 Ecover has never tested any finished products or ingredients on sentient animals, nor has it ordered such tests by third parties.
• For research and product development Ecover uses alternative methods of testing only: e.g. based on bacteria, Daphnia, algae, red blood cells or theoretical evaluation models.
• Ecover do not condone or advocate animal testing. Ecover will not knowingly accept or work with suppliers that we know test ingredients on animals.
• Ecover is not a member of BIBRA (British Industrial Biological Research Association, contract testing laboratory in the UK) or any other contract testing laboratory.
• Ecover supports the Fund for the Replacement of Animals in Medical Experiments (FRAME)
How Ecover produce products with a minimum impact on the environment
Ecover is a pioneering company. Our objective is to make cleaning products which have a minimal impact on the environment. Ecover products are developed using formulations based on plant and mineral ingredients as an alternative to the petrochemical based brands which currently dominate the market.
All Ecover ingredients are chosen to ensure that our products achieve the lowest possible toxicity and the most rapid and complete biodegradability to minimise the impact on the environment and all life forms. In addition to this, the products must perform and be available at a reasonable price. To achieve this Ecover is continually developing and testing new ingredients. We do not perform these tests on animals but employ alternative methods. Because of these demanding objectives, Ecover works with a higher proportion of new ingredients in order to continue to offer improved overall environmental advantages, benefiting all forms of life: whether human, animal or plant.
Legal Requirements
Legislation demands that in order for ingredients to be included in a product, they must be proved as safe. This frequently involves a requirement for animal testing, as there are so few accepted methods of alternative testing. Organisations like FRAME strive to eliminate the need for animal tests through the development, validation and acceptance of alternative methods of testing. Until recently, alternative methods of testing, such as the Episkin test approved by the BUAV, have not been considered robust enough to be validated by the European Commission. However, more funding for research into improving these tests has now been released, and the European Commission is moving further towards the validation of alternative tests.
Five Year Rolling Rule vs. Fixed Cut off Date
There are currently two options for a manufacturer wishing either to purchase raw materials or to produce new products/ingredients which can state the claim ‘not tested on animals’: the Fixed Cut Off Date policy or the Five Year Rolling Rule policy. Manufacturers who implement the fixed cut off date will not purchase or use raw materials that have been tested on animals after the specified date, chosen by the manufacturer. This means that no new chemicals brought to the market after this date can be used by the manufacturer, since testing to prove safety is required by law, and animal testing is generally the only accepted method. Therefore this would mean an ingredient could not be used even if it offers clear environmental benefits.
The five year rolling rule allows manufacturers to use new ingredients from a supplier after a five year period since testing has elapsed. Ecover strive to constantly improve the impact our products have on the environment, which means trialling different formulations to ensure a balance of minimum ecological impact and performance. Ecover declare a five year rolling rule, as we believe this allows us to continue to pioneer in ecological developments as new ingredients come onto the market. However, we continue to push for the development and validation of alternative tests.
Some organisations promoting animal welfare believe that a Five Year Rolling Rule does not go far enough. However, by declaring a Fixed Cut Off Date, Ecover would be prevented from choosing new ingredients and advances in our products which could further benefit the environment. Reducing our impact on the environment - starting from aquatic life and moving up the food chain - lies at the heart of our company ethos, meaning our priority is to make products which are less harmful to the world’s ecological systems. For example, the development in 2006 of Ecover’s Non Biological Integrated Washing Powder has allowed Ecover to introduce a new generation of surfactants based on bio diesel (Non GM) resulting in significant benefits to the environment (ie being 10 times less toxic to water life than the surfactants they replace). These developments were made without animal testing. However, these ingredients are also available on the market to other manufacturers and may or may not have been animal tested.
Ecover applies the Five Year Rolling Rule and face the consequences that come along with it. In 2004, Ecover Denmark was forced to put a hazard sign on its washing powder packaging because it refused to submit animal testing data proving product safety. This unfortunate ruling led to the ironic situation where an Ecover product is marked as hazardous while all conventional brands are considered safe because they do submit animal testing results. Needless to say, Ecover is perfectly capable of proving our products are as safe as or safer than other products by using alternative testing methods.
What tests do Ecover perform?
As a responsible company that declares our products have a minimum impact on the environment, we feel that it is ethical for us to understand the impact our products have on the environment, rather than to assume. This means we need to understand how toxic our products are to aquatic life. By looking at the lowest levels of life forms in our aquatic systems, we can gauge the impact products will have after use, when they are released down the drain into our water system. The test for aquatic toxicity is undertaken once during the development of a product and is performed on Daphnia magna, a non-sentient invertebrate commonly known as a water flea. All fresh water systems all over the world contain Daphnia - on average there are 120 for each litre of water on the planet. They are classified by the scientific community as Plankton.
In 2007, The Vegan Society disagreed over Ecover testing on Daphnia, despite it far exceeding the EU definition of animal testing as the use of vertebrates, past a specified embryonic stage, or larval stage in the case of fish and amphibians. This resulted in a mutual agreement to remove the Vegan Society trademark from Ecover’s products. Ecover continue to uphold our beliefs and mission to produce products with less impact on the environment in an economical, ecological and socially responsible way.Ecover page on animal testing (opens new tab/window)
Ecover Careline: 08451 302 230
Categories: AdminSend feedback » • PermalinkIf you have a problem with any product and think it should be returned for a refund or replacement, please contact me as soon as possible.
Essential's policy is to to issue me with a returns number until they have received the problem product, which would normally be a month later when I receive the next order. The credit is then available after another month.
If you let me know within a day or two or three I may be able to credit your next order or refund you and make other arrangements with Essential.
Categories: NutrientsSend feedback » • PermalinkKidney Stones and Cataracts
Oxalates and carotenoids (beta-carotene, lutein and zeaxanthin) are the nutrients under consideration. What the article doesn't clearly say, is that whereas spinach may be good for the eyes it may not be so good for you if you have kidney stones. dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/health
Categories: NutrientsSend feedback » • PermalinkTaking high doses of vitamin E supplements can increase the risk of lung cancer, research suggests. As little as 400mg of Vit E supplements corresponds to a 28% increase in lung cancer.
The US study of 77,000 people found taking 400 milligrams per day long-term increased cancer risk by 28% - with smokers at particular risk.
It follows warnings about similar risks of excessive beta-carotene use.Writing in the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, an expert said people should get their vitamins from fruit and veg.
The jury's still very much out on whether vitamin and mineral supplements can affect cancer risk Henry Scowcroft, Cancer Research UK
Dr Tim Byers, from the University of Colorado, said a healthy, balanced diet meant people took in a whole range of beneficial nutrients and minerals, which might help to reduce cancer risk.
The researchers followed people aged between 50 and 76 for four years and looked at their average daily use of vitamin C and folic acid, and vitamin E supplements.
Over the course of the study, 521 people developed lung cancer.
Smoking, family history and age all had unsurprisingly strong links to cancer risk.
And while neither vitamin C or folic acid use had any effect on lung cancer risk, vitamin E use did.
The researchers extrapolated their findings, and concluded that over a decade, there was an additional 7% increase in risk for every 100 milligrams taken per day.
The vitamin E trend was most prominent among smokers, but was not confined to them.
Vitamin E is known to be an antioxidant - protecting cells from molecules called free radicals.But the US researchers speculate that, in high doses, it may also act as a pro-oxidant - causing oxidation and therefore damage to cells.
Toxic effects
Dr Christopher Slatore of the University of Washington in Seattle, who led the study, said: "In contrast to the often assumed benefits or at least lack of harm, supplemental vitamin E was associated with a small increased risk of lung cancer.
"Future studies may focus on other components of fruits and vegetables that may explain the decreased risk of cancer that has been associated with fruit and vegetables.
"Meanwhile, our results should prompt clinicians to counsel patients that these supplements are unlikely to reduce the risk of lung cancer and may be detrimental."
But Henry Scowcroft, senior science information officer at Cancer Research UK, said: "The jury's still very much out on whether vitamin and mineral supplements can affect cancer risk.
"Some studies suggest a benefit, but many others show no effect and some, like this one, suggest they may even increase risk."
He added: "Research repeatedly shows that a healthy, balanced diet can reduce your risk of some cancers while giving you all the vitamins you need.
"Quitting smoking remains the most effective way to avoid many cancers. There's no diet, or vitamin supplement, that could ever counter the toxic effects of cigarette smoke."
In 2002 a Finnish study of 29,000 male smokers found taking beta-carotene - which is converted into vitamin A in the body - was linked to an 18% increased risk of developing lung cancer
Story from BBC NEWS:
https://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/health/7271189.stm
Published: 2008/02/29 16:11:30 GMT
©BBC MMVIII
What is it?
Vitamin E
ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/vitamine.asp
Vitamin E is a fat-soluble vitamin that exists in eight different forms. Each form has its own biological activity, which is the measure of potency or functional use in the body 1.
Alpha‑tocopherol (α‑tocopherol)is the name of the most active form of vitamin E in humans. It is also a powerful biological antioxidant 2‑3.
Vitamin E in supplements is usually sold as alpha‑tocopheryl acetate, a form of alpha‑tocopherol that protects its ability to function as an antioxidant. The synthetic form is labelled "D, L" while the natural form is labelled "D". The synthetic form is only half as active as the natural form 4.
Antioxidants such as vitamin E act to protect your cells against the effects of free radicals, which are potentially damaging by‑products of energy metabolism. Free radicals can damage cells and may contribute to the development of cardiovascular disease and cancer. Studies are under-way to determine whether vitamin E, through its ability to limit production of free radicals, might help prevent or delay the development of those chronic diseases. Vitamin E has also been shown to play a role in immune function, in DNA repair, and other metabolic processes 2‑3.
Sources of Vitamin E per 100grammes of food
Nuts and grains (whole seeds) and vegetables
Recommended daily intake is 15mgAlmonds 23mg
Hazel nuts 15mg
Rapeseed oil (Unrefined and cold pressed) 23mg
Peanuts (Whole) 12mg
Olive oil 12mg
Sunflower seeds 25mgWheat Germ oil 149mg
Wheat grain 1mg
Whole Wheat flour 1mg
but you will be lucky to get 0.8g of flour given the 25% loss likely after some 6 months. Stability in wheat flour